BETSY BRINSON: This is an unrehearsed interview with Suzy Post, conducted at her
Residence in Louisville Kentucky, on January 11, 1998, and I’m Betsy Brinson.
BRINSON: Okay. Suzy, thank you for doing this with me.
SUZY POST: Glad to. I hope it yields you something.
BRINSON: Well, I think it will. I’ll tell you more about this project later,
how it’s developing and whatnot. But today, we really kind of want to focus
on you and your involvement. Why don’t you start at the very beginning, like
where you were born, your family, siblings, parent’s background, your growing up?
POST: Okay, I can do that. I’m a real anomaly, I’m a Louisville native.
My father was also a Louisville native. My mother was from Terre Haute Indiana,
1:00and they were married in ‘29, and had me in 1933 in the depth of theDepression. So much of who I am is formed by the Depression experience. I had
twin brother and sister who came right behind me, about two and a half years
later. The three of us grew up in this town and are all living here now. My
mom and dad were very community focused, very, uh, very committed to the goals
of particularly the Louisville Jewish community, which is small. It’s under
10,000 people, but very sophisticated in terms of the organizations it
maintains. Mom was real involved in a women’s group called Hadassah, and my
dad was real involved in the organizations that--the serious, important
organizations that--really shaped this community as a Jewish, as a good Jewish
place to grow up. And those were the Jewish Community Federation, and he was
very involved in the
2:00United Jewish Appeal, which is the annual fund-raisingdrive in the Jewish community. So, I saw a lot of activity growing up in the
house. Activity that was geared toward giving something back to your community.
Neither my mom or dad went to school, college. Mother went to Normal College
up in Terre Haute Indiana, and got a teaching certificate, a two-year teaching
certificate. I think that, uh, she sort of always rested her laurels on that,
although her other two sisters had the same degree. Mother never--mother was
one of those women who really wanted to be more and do more, but never could
break away. Part of that was because she was married to a very German
patriarch, so any time she made, any effort she made to break away later, he’d
just snap her back one way or another telling her that he couldn’t afford to
have her work because it would drive their taxes, income taxes up. I mean,
it’s just so transparent to me now,
3:00in fact, it was then too. I had a veryaverage, normal Jewish childhood, girlhood here. I was experienced as a
schoolchild--rejection--I was not accepted into the inner sanctum of the popular
kids in this eighth graded elementary. So I decided I had to be accepted by
them; it was just desperately important to me. And that--I took a survey; I
thought this was pretty clever actually--I took a survey of the class. We were
all in that class for eight years together in those days so we knew --
BRINSON: Was that a public school?
POST: Yeah, county school. We knew each other pretty well. And I took a
survey of the class to see what we had and maybe what role I could play. I
looked around and there was no class clown and--nor--so I decided to be the
class clown. The way I did it was I became the strongest girl at Melbourne
Heights. I
4:00had a lot of physical strength then. I moved furniture--oh, thesilly things that I did in order to attract attention to myself and sort of be
accepted --
BRINSON: And you’re so small.
POST: Well, I guess we were all small, smaller then. And somehow I finally
broke into the inner circle. And I think about that as how awful that must have
been for a girl, you know, to have been locked out. I don’t know, I
probably--I don’t remember being humiliated, and I don’t remember the pain
and the … But I know that I felt I was locked out and I wasn’t accepted,
and that I had to develop a strategy to become accepted. I did what all the
Jewish girls growing up at that time in the forties did. I started dating when
I was twelve and thirteen, and I always dated boys who were much older than me.
I mean, like four and five years older than me which is ridiculous. But at the
time that the Jewish community--at the time that the women and
5:00girls in theJewish community were where I was in high school and junior high school, at the
end of the second world war--the Jewish boys who came back to Louisville from
that war found that the Jewish girls who were their ages had married GIs who
were sent to Ft. Knox here. So there’s this big vacuum, so they started
reaching lower and lower, deeper and deeper into the community. So probably
most of us, very unhealthily, went out with boys who were three and four and
five years older than us. I had a couple of proposals when I was sixteen. I
mean it’s ridiculous.
BRINSON: Did you entertain any of them?
POST: No. God, no. So I decided that what I wanted to do was go to medical
school, and announced that to my mother one night when we were washing dishes,
or she was washing, I was drying. And she said, “Oh, you can’t do that.”
She said, “They have a Jewish quota and a female quota.” And I guess I
didn’t want to do it very badly cause I didn’t, you know, I took her at her
word and that was that. So
6:00I sort of set my aspirations much lower: went awayto Indiana University as a freshman, became an English literature major, which
is what we all did in those days when we didn’t know what we were going to do.
Joined the NAACP and that was in 1950, 1951 to ‘52.
BRINSON: What prompted --?
POST: And the reason I did that--I had a marvelous teacher in my senior year at
high school. She was a problems teacher.
BRINSON: A what kind?
POST: Problems, they called it. Sort of sociology is what it was. We had
assignments and we had to do research and adopt--do a paper on some issue of
social significance at the time. I did a--maybe it was my junior year I
guess--did a--I decided I wanted to do a study of the American Negro, which is
what we called black people back then. First we called them colored, then we
called them Negro, then we called them black, and now we’re calling them
African American, and God knows what comes next. And I went down to the
Louisville
7:00Urban League in Louisville to do--get some data and some reports fromthem, and did this paper and got sort of fascinated by the situation. I don’t
know what turned me on to that. I don’t know why. It certainly wasn’t
anything that was in the air in 1951 in Louisville. I mean, it was like nobody
talked about race; it just didn’t exist as an issue. But --
BRINSON: Let me stop you there because in Louisville in the forties, uh,
Thurgood Marshall was working with the NAACP --
POST: Right.
BRINSON: …around some issues.
POST: Right. But that was--I was not--I didn’t even--I wasn’t even
cognizant of it.
BRINSON: You weren’t aware of that in any way. Let me take you back a little
bit more. You were aware, I assume, that it was a segregated society?
POST: Umm …I’m not sure.
BRINSON: You went to school …
POST: Oh, yeah, I know. But, as I say, race was not an issue.
BRINSON: Okay.
POST: So
8:00I went to a school, segregated sexually--I went to an all girls highschool. In those days the only school that wasn’t segregated sexually was
Central High which was the only black school. So we didn’t have to
protect--the parents--we didn’t protect white, black girls from black boys.
But I don’t remember being terribly aware of it. I guess I knew it on one
level but it wasn’t that palpable that it was, you know--and I can’t tell
you that any one incident triggered in me a real deep passion to try to set the
equation right. I have no idea. I don’t even--I know I joined the NAA-,
student NAACP because of this paper that I’d done in high school and my
realization that there was gross inequity. But it was--I mean, it wasn’t
something I confronted on a daily basis. It was more an intellectual exercise.
BRINSON: And you graduated, again, what year? High school.
POST: Fifty-one.
BRINSON: Fifty-one, okay.
POST: One
9:00of the friends I made immediately when I went up to Indiana was agraduate English….student from New York City who was--her last name was
Baumgarten; and she was the niece of Kermit Baumgarten, who was a big theater
mover and shaker, a very big name in New York City theater. We liked each other
a whole lot and I invited her home with me one weekend, and she readily
accepted. In those days Indiana University, which is ninety miles to the north
of Louisville, could only be arrived by train. There was a ( ) train that
took four hours, if you can believe it, almost four hours to get from Louisville
to Bloomington, Indiana, cause none of the students had cars. I mean, it was
just a different time. So Sandy and I arranged to come home on one particular
weekend. We got home on the ( ) train, pulled in to Union Station, which is
down at Tenth and Broadway and is now the TARC bus
10:00headquarters. We get off thetrain, we’re walking down the platform to go into the, into the, uh --
BRINSON: Terminal?
POST: Well, it’s the station, and I turn around and Sandy is white as a
ghost. I mean, she’s stopped in her tracks and she’s white as a ghost. I
said, “What’s the matter?” And I followed her eyes, where she was
looking, and what she saw was white/colored: white drinking fountain, colored
drinking fountain, white waiting room, colored waiting room. And I looked at
that and she was horrified. She would never come back to Louisville after that
again. And what’s interesting, I think, about that is, that that had been a
situation I had been exposed to many, many, many times and not seen. It took
this experience with a stranger for me to see it. That had a profound impact on
me. I mean that--not only that I saw it, but that I hadn’t seen it.
BRINSON: And you were already a member
11:00of the NAACP.POST: Yeah, right. But I hadn’t seen it because it’s so pervasive. It’s
everywhere and you just get used to it.
BRINSON: How did your family feel about you joining the NAACP? That was pretty
unusual for that time.
POST: I don’t think they ever knew it. I don’t think I ever told them. I
sort of felt that my mom and dad were not, were beneath me intellectually, which
is a terrible way to phrase it, but that’s the way--you know, because I was in
college and they hadn’t really gone to a real college, although dad went to
night law school. They were fairly well read--they were not uneducated--but
they were, had had no formal education. They sort of subscribed to the beliefs
that were current in the local Jewish community at the time and didn’t really,
didn’t really adopt other new attitudes. So I just sort of--I wasn’t close
to them that way. Although, interestingly enough, in my later years my father
promoted everything I did, supported it, supported me, you know, and I was out
there on some really wild issues. He just thought I
12:00was wonderful and he, hesort of agreed with me. He had good instincts and good values that just never
got really worked out. At the time that I went away to Indiana University,
which was--the fifties were so ho-hum and so--this was the--those were the times
of crinoline skirts and white buck shoes, or saddle shoes and bobby socks. I
remember everything I wore was one size at least too big so that my body
wouldn’t show through it. I wore big--I wore size thirty-eight and forty
pullover sweaters so that nobody could tell I had breasts. It was just amazing.
Uh --
BRINSON: Did you wear shorts?
POST: Huh?
BRINSON: Bermuda shorts?
POST: That was later, ‘52 or 3. I wore Bermuda shorts with knee socks and a
plaid belt. Uh, I think that the absence of any
13:00real intellectual ferment orstimulation in my life at that time is a great loss. I think that I could
have--I would have obviously developed differently if I’d had more of that.
What I had, I craved. I married a man who I was attracted to, basically, on the
strength of his intellect. He was a very smart man. It wasn’t a great
emotional marriage. It was, I thought, a meeting of two minds and I thought he
was--at that point, I really believed, somehow came to the conclusion that we
needed a revolution in this country. And this is beyond race, that the
inequities that existed had to be changed. I thought he felt the same way
because he knew all the Spanish Civil War songs, and all the good old labor
songs. So we got married in ‘53 --
BRINSON: How did you meet?
POST: I knew him from the time I was thirteen. He just hung out--he was four
years older. I met him the first time at a dance, through the friend of his
14:00sister’s. He cut in on somebody I was dancing with.BRINSON: He was from here in Louisville?
POST: He was from New York, but moved here when his--his family moved here when
he was twelve. He was a real prick. I mean, in those years--I tell you, the
first date I had with him, we walked to the movies. I was thirteen or fourteen;
he was seventeen or eighteen. We’re walking to the movies in the
neighborhood, and he said something about Das Kapital. I said, “What?” and
he said, “Well, haven’t you read Das Kapital?” He was a real intellectual
snob and he, he was humbled later on in life, but he was just a terrible prick.
I have no--I think what happened with him and me was that I had this real sexual
awakening, or wanted to have this real sexual activity, when I was eighteen and
nineteen and we just didn’t do that. There were no pills and I was terrified
of pregnancy. He was available. One night we went to
15:00see a movie--I hadn’tseen him for a couple of years, and one night we went to see a movie. It was
very romantic and I just got all juiced up. So, honestly, it was just the
silliest reason to get married because--I either married him because of
intellect, which it turned out wasn’t really where I thought it was going to
be, or because of sex, which is a really stupid reason to get married -- and
then have five kids and stay together for thirty-three years.
BRINSON: So you dropped out of Indiana to get married or --?
POST: I moved--I came home; I transferred to the University of Louisville. We
were married in my, end of my sophomore year. He went into the navy. It was at
the end of the Korean War, people were being drafted, he hadn’t gone to OCS,
he’d gone to law school. After law school, he signed up for four years with
the Officers Candidate School so he wouldn’t be drafted. We went from--I went
from Louisville--he got orders to San Francisco. I mean, really, that was --
and I transferred out to the University of California at Berkeley and graduated,
and started graduate work out there.
BRINSON: Okay.
16:00Stop there. When you got to California, you had how many children?POST: None.
BRINSON: You had no children.
POST: I was just newly married.
BRINSON: You were newly married. And you were there for how long?
POST: Almost four years.
BRINSON: Okay. And you actually graduated from Berkeley?
POST: From Berkeley, yeah. And I had hoped than when I transferred out there
that I would meet people through the university and I didn’t. It was--it was
a very Greek school in the fifties, which--people meet me and they find out I
came out of Berkeley and they say, “Oh, well, no wonder.” Berkeley had very
little to do with my intellectual development. It really didn’t. In those
days, it was really crinolines and white bucks and Alpha Epsilon--I mean, it was
so Greek and I was so opposed--I had some very strange opinions and I’m not
sure where I got them. I thought the sororities and fraternities were horribly
elitist and unreal. I didn’t want to have anything to do with it. I wanted
to
17:00be--if the hippies had been around then, I would have, you know, I would havebeen one. They weren’t. I wanted to be bohemian, but I came out of too
conventional a background to be able to pull that off. But I never really fit
into straight, conventional, social--you know, I always was very questioning and
I was always very--I looked sort of subversive and irreverent. I was intent and
I got out there thinking I was going to make friends and I didn’t, because the
community was just generally very transient, and the undergraduate community was
very Greek. It was too big. There were 5,000 in my graduating class which in
those days, in 1955 when I got my degree, was--5,000 was a huge number of people
to graduate from the university.
BRINSON: You were still majoring in English --?
POST: In English literature, and I graduated with honors. And graduated in
three and a half years, which I was very pleased with, with all the transferring
and had to pick up extra credits and blah, blah, blah. I didn’t go to my
graduation. I
18:00wasn’t going to sit there through, you know, 5,000 studentsfull of bullshit from some people you know, some officials I didn’t know. So
I didn’t go. About a month later, I went over to the Sprowl Hall, which is
the administration building in front of which all these free speech things were
held in the sixties. This was before it hit its glory with Mario Savio. I went
in to get my diploma, so I go up to the regis--the whatever window, and I said,
“I need my diploma. Uh, my name is Suzanne Post and I graduated, you know,
last month.” So, she goes and she gets a piece of paper and she gives it to
me. I turned around to walk away and she says, “Excuse me. There are honors
attached.” So I went back and she gave me another piece of paper. It was
that, it was that kind of a thing. And that kind of an attitude was pretty much
an attitude that has stayed with me. I really don’t like hollow ceremonies.
I had a
19:00real hard time psyching myself up to want to go to any of mychildren’s graduations. I mean, it’s not an admiral characteristic when it
affects people who don’t share my point of view, but -- I have a real hard
time with hollowness. I mean, I really do. I don’t know why I do, but I do.
BRINSON: Do you remember when you were at Berkeley, uh, was it a predominantly
white student body? Introduced to other cultures and --?
POST: Back then, back then there was already a significant Asian--in fact, the
thing that I loved about the Bay area was the diversity of its population. And
I’ll tell you an interesting story that I always use. I lived about eight
blocks from campus on a little street called McGee. I used to shop in a little
grocery store about five blocks away that I could walk to, that wasn’t a mom
and pop, teeny, teeny but it wasn’t big. It was a small grocery store. I’d
20:00go in there pretty regularly unless I had access to a car, and then I’d goover to Treasure Island where Ed was stationed and shop in the commissary
because it was cheaper. And I walked--after I’d been there five or six
months, I’m in this little grocery one day, and I’m bending over the produce
counter to reach for a head of lettuce and I banged against the wall of this
produce counter. There was a mirror running the whole length which is
frequently used to make the thing look roomier, and airier, and bigger. So
I’m bending in picking up this head of lettuce and I looked up in the mirror
and I noticed in the reflection in the mirror that I was the only white person
in this little store. And, gosh, that’s strange. I checked out and walked
home, and on the way home I’m thinking, you know, this neighborhood that I
live in is like, forty percent white maybe, forty --forty-five percent white,
21:00maybe twenty-twenty-five percent Asian, maybe ten percent black, maybe another xpercent Native American. And it had been like that from the day I moved in,
obviously, and I never noticed it. It was like the colored waiting room and the
black waiting room all over, uh, white waiting room, all over again. I had
never noticed that, even though I came from a very, very traditional white
Jewish background in Louisville. And I tell people the reason I didn’t notice
it is ‘cause that community worked so well. It was just our community,
that’s all it is. I think that was, that and the physical beauty of the Bay
area, were the two things that really hooked me and when, four years later, I
moved back to Louisville, I was very depressed. For about six months, went
through a real --
BRINSON: You came back --?
POST: Came back in 1957.
BRINSON: Okay.
POST: And
22:00I came back pregnant with a second child. Ed was going--we weregoing to start a new life. We had all kinds of possibilities and I was really
down. I didn’t even quite understand why I was down. It was only later that
I could look back on that period. and realize that I was grieving for this
community that I’d left, because I had returned to a community that was--you
had two choices: you could be black, or white, you could be Baptist, or you
could be Catholic. That’s it. Louisville is much different than it was in
‘57. So that was, that was really hard for me after the Bay area experience
because I thought the diversity was just wonderful. It was so interesting, and
I really loved it. When I came back in ‘57, one of the very first things I
did was join the American Civil Liberties Union, which had just been formed in
1955 around the Braden sedition trial. My father had started sending me
clippings from the
23:00newspaper about that trial, about Ann and Carl. I justthought it was just the most outrageous thing I’d ever heard of. I also sort
of knew that the right to political dissent was really going to be in jeopardy
in this state unless there was a strong voice in support of, you know, free
speech. I think the ACLU, when I joined it, maybe had one hundred twenty
members or something. And, uh, I just--I sort of valued the concept without
being terribly familiar with the organization, and wanted to support it. Not
too many years later--I think I had maybe three children, so it might have been
two years later--the woman who was our executive secretary, she was the wife of
a psychology professor at the university who just died, was being paid to keep
records of the FKCLU and to get out the newsletter, do simple clerical
24:00 stufflike that. She sent out a newsletter and I guess I--it said, “Do you want to
volunteer?” And you could check your name and I sent it back. She called me
one day and she asked me if I’d help her with the newsletter, and I said,
“Yeah.” And the next thing I know, she’d dropped my name in to be
membership chair, so I got really active and in between pregnancies really
spent--and that stuff--spent a lot of time with them. Uh, it wasn’t the kind
of organization that we really needed later. It was just sort of a white,
liberal, old men basically, talking session.
BRINSON: This was still late fifties?
POST: And into the sixties, and into the sixties. It just--they talked and
they would pass--it used to drive me crazy, Betsy--they would--some horrendous
situation was operating in the Commonwealth. They would have a board meeting,
pass a resolution condemning it, and never do a damn thing with the resolution.
They wouldn’t send it to the paper, they wouldn’t send it to the, you know,
body that had--it was just absurd and it drove me
25:00crazy. I mean, I didn’twant to waste my time and energy working with an organization that wasn’t
going to develop some kind of an active program. I got more and more deeply
involved in the sixties, of course. In terms of my personal life …I guess, a
couple of general observations. You’ve asked me to try and remember women who
were active in, white women who were active in the civil rights movement, and
I’ve been thinking about that a lot. There really weren’t very many of us
and the--including me, I wasn’t--and I’ve always thought that I wasn’t
real active because I was having five children every other year--not five every
other year, one every other year till I got to five. But in thinking about it,
I was reminded myself of the fact that, back in those days if you wanted to be
effective, you worked through a man. I can remember
26:00really clearly twooccasions on which I did that. One was when Barry Goldwater was running against
Lyndon Johnson in ‘64. I was just horrified by Goldwater’s conservativism.
I wanted, just couldn’t bear--and I wanted somebody--I wanted our democratic
governor, who was Ned Breathitt, to do something and he just sat on his butt and
he didn’t do a thing. He didn’t do a thing. I just kept--it just kept
driving me nuts because I felt at the time, as did a lot of people, that
Goldwater was going to, you know, run to victory and then we’re going to have
who knows what? Be bombed--bombed back to the stone age. So what I did was so,
I think, typical of American women with an activist bent in this part of the
country. I programmed Ed. I kept working on Ed, and working on Ed, and working
on Ed, until finally he got as concerned as I did. And this
27:00is pretty true ofmy whole marriage to him. I ‘d be upset about an issue and I’d work and
work and work on him till finally he got to where I was. I had to pull him
along just kicking and screaming. All he really wanted to do was practice law.
And I worked on him enough so that he created--he set out to create a Citizens
for Johnson committee. He got nine other men who would put up $1,000 and commit
to working on this campaign, and find ten other men--or it wasn’t $1,000
‘cause we didn’t have $1,000; it must have been $100. But they committed to
raise $10,000 to open an office. And the office was opened and these men--they
were all men, I mean the idea of something like that happening today is too
hilarious for words--but there were ten white men who were the Citizens for
Johnson campaign. The governor eventually had to deal with them cause they
were, we were doing something. The people who were running it were women. It
28:00was all women running it.BRINSON: Women did the mailings and the committee organizing?
POST: Oh, yeah, we did everything. We did everything. I mean, we did
everything. They had these intellectual talking sessions; we’d program them
and stuff. It was absurd. Such a waste of energy when you think about how
difficult it was for us to make our voices heard. The same thing happened with
the McCarthy campaign. I was one of two state coordinators for the Gene
McCarthy campaign four years later, and by then I’d gotten some political
savvy, and was really a pretty good organizer. I was spending a lot of time
organizing my own legislative district which was highly charged politically,
very progressive district. I had Ed front for me on the day of the
congressional, the congressional convention. He was the one who got up there in
front of people, and later I started to get really angry about it, like why
didn’t, you know--and he didn’t do any of the shit work or any of the hard
work, and he gets
29:00out there in front. I’m thinking, Well, you know, at leasthe did it. At least--but that was so typical, and in terms of the civil rights
movement, women just didn’t have--and it wasn’t just white women, black
women didn’t have that role either. All of us were in the back of the bus.
BRINSON: Yeah, I’m finding that more and more.
POST: So that was really a product of women’s failure to take control of
their lives. I think what changed for me was really the radical women who came
South to work on the anti-war movement. A lot of them, SDS, you know,
University of Chicago. Vassar women who came South to work on the movement, and
who were pissed because the way they were treated in the anti-war movement.
Some of them had been in the civil rights movement in the South, and they
didn’t like that either. They
30:00started talking to me and they reallyradicalized me as far as women’s--I hate to use the word ‘oppression’
because it’s a little too big a word, but whatever it was, ‘exploitation.’
I certainly think we were exploited. They began to work on me, and I began to
listen to them. And I began to see parallels in terms of my marriage and the
larger social issues. It was real--it was a really exhilarating experience.
They were very sharp and I really felt that I’ve owed younger women a real
debt because they took the time with me.
BRINSON: Okay. Let me stop you there a minute. By, uh, 1961 we, Louisville,
as I understand it, actually had experienced a series of protests from the black
community and boycotts against particular merchants, stores, and whatnot.
POST: Right.
BRINSON: Do you remember any of that?
POST: I have no memory of it.
BRINSON: Okay. Do you
31:00recall any sort of violent incidents that got recordedin the media, or …?
POST: I remember nothing of it. Sort of sad.
BRINSON: Okay. Well, I’m not even sure how much of it was reported in the
media. So, okay, uh --
POST: The first time I recall any effort of white people, and it was pretty
much spearheaded by white women, to make some inroads on the race issue was the
open housing movement.
BRINSON: I want to get to that in a minute.
POST: Okay, you’re not there yet.
BRINSON: No. Did you continue to belong to the NAACP, or did you give that up
when you went to Berkeley?
POST: No, I--well, I didn’t--no, it was a student chapter, and even today
you’d never get a bill from the NAACP for your membership. I mean, you have
to call them up and say, “Would you please --?” It’s so absurd. I
didn’t join again until
32:00probably the sixties.BRINSON: Okay. Do you recall what prompted you to do that?
POST: Probably all the stuff that was going on all over in the sixties.
BRINSON: Okay. Do you recall growing up, or up till that period reading any
black literature, seeing plays or …?
POST: None. None. Totally bereft. Completely sterile.
BRINSON: Okay. Of the women who came from the North, were there any in
particular that you remember, that you can recall?
POST: Joan Goldsmith is her name. She lives in California now. She came out
of Antioch, in fact later married the son of a president of Antioch after
they’d lived together five years; and then, of course, they did what everybody
did: they split up. She wrote a Vietnam curriculum guide--I think she was
living in Boston at that time--and her younger brother worked
33:00with me on the, inthe anti-war stuff. She was, she was just amazing. I haven’t seen her for a
long time but we talk. Joanie is about fifteen years younger than I am, I
guess. She’s probably about fifty now. She was one of the most--she was one
who had a lot of impact on me. Another one is a woman named Joy Portugal, who
is Canadian, who is a member of the Communist Party, and who came to live and
work with Ann and Carl Scaff. She came from ( ) and wanted to--actively--as a
lot of young people in those days--wanted to work with Ann and Carl because they
had this biracial campaign in the South. She had a lot of impact on me. She
was also about fifteen years younger than me, and I still stay very in touch,
much in touch with Joy. She’s worked for a variety of unions and she worked,
she went to New York about ten or twelve years ago to take a job as editor of
34:00The Daily World for $8,000 -- and managed. I do not know how anybody lives inNew York City on $8,000, but later my son did it, too. So I guess it can be
done if you’re committed. So she had an impact on me.
BRINSON: Has she come back to Louisville?
POST: Not to live. She comes back to visit. She owns a duplex here, and
she’s still very politically tied in.
BRINSON: Okay. I’ve been told about another woman who worked with Ann who --
POST: Jan Phillips?
BRINSON: Umm --
POST: Laurie --
BRINSON: -- who’s actually now doing theater, or art, or something of that sort.
POST: There’s so many. Was it Ilene I wonder?
BRINSON: I don’t know. I could go back --
POST: There’s a range, a full range of women. The women who were here with
the greatest permanence--length of time--were Joy and a woman named Jan
Phillips, who worked for Ann, who you’ll probably want to talk to, who is just
leaving a job as the director of the Louisville Tennis Association. She’s a
very close friend of mine. She was the Communist Party organizer for
35:00 Kentuckyfor a number of years. She’s got--she’s great on--she’s leaving the
tennis association to run a party, uh -- scholarship fund called the Davis Fund,
which is sort of located--its major locus is in New York. She’s going to do
development and outreach for that out here in Louisville. You should talk to
her. Her telephone number is: 451-1820 is home; then work is 587-0290. She
doesn’t have an answering machine at home.
BRINSON: Okay.
POST: She’d be, she’d be really good material. She’s not from Louisville.
BRINSON: Okay.
POST: The women who came and worked with Ann and Carl were not from Louisville.
They were transplants.
BRINSON: 1968. Do you recall any of the riots in Louisville?
POST: Oh, God, yes.
BRINSON: Can you talk about that a little bit?
POST: Well,
36:00there were--I think the one I remember best was the one at 28th andGreenwood which was really a mess. We had little mini riots, but for Louisville
they were very significant. And I think--I think that was fomented by a guy
named James Cortez who was a real crazy black guy who was sort of livid And
I’m not even sure that there were any major issues or what they were. Ann
would know that far better than I cause I was--my job during that time was just
to help raise money to get people out of jail. I know there was an effort at
about that time by our commonwealth attorney to prosecute some black leadership
for supposedly plotting to throw, to blow up the west--you know about that one.
Just ridiculous baby stuff. The police chief was a guy named William Hyde who
had a little black book of Louisville’s most
37:00dangerous people. And it waspathetic; I mean, it was just pathetic. Somebody got their hands on it; it was
printed and Carl was in there.
BRINSON: So your job you said was to raise money --?
POST: My job--that’s all I did. I raised money for bail.
BRINSON: How did you do that?
POST: Well, we had a certain list that we just worked. We called people and
said, you know, and they kicked in, because people were very upset about what
was happening. There was a lot of railroading going on, and a lot innocent
people being shoved, you know, into jail. I guess our first exposure to that
was the open housing campaign, because there was some spillover on the streets
on that. An awful lot of people went to jail. I remember one time the ACLU had
its new members party at the home of a black physician named Maurice Rabb. He
had a big basement room. And somebody had gone down to get people out of jail
so they could come to this party, and it was just a really heady--I didn’t
know most of the people who had been arrested. I mean, it was sort of
really--it was a very heady experience ‘cause you
38:00felt like, you know, we wereall sort of working at this together. I did very, very little. Very, very
little ‘cause I was really--I had these five children, and there was no way I
could, that I had the energy to do both. Moreover, at that time I had a really
unsupportive husband who -- it was just too much. So I did very, very little.
I mean, my heart was there, and, in fact, that whole civil rights effort coupled
with the anti-war campaign sort of merged to become, I think, the precipitating
factor in the breakup of my marriage, which didn’t occur until 1986. It took
that long, but --
BRINSON: How do you see that?
POST: Well, I was so--I was at the time so convinced of the immorality of what
was occurring
39:00both racially--and I guess I thought the Vietnam War was a racialthing, too--and our involvement in that country where I didn’t feel we had any
business. I was just so convinced of that and it seemed to be--that was--the
civil rights issues and the anti-war issues were the defining issues of my
world. And I was married to a man who told me that he had to believe that this
government knew what it was doing. And then when it came to race, he’d say,
“Yeah, it’s terrible,” and didn’t want, didn’t do anything, you know?
Just didn’t do anything. And then I’m hanging out with all these much
younger radicals, and I just thought they were so right. And, and --
BRINSON: Were your children old enough, any of them, at that point to have any
feelings or reactions to what you were involved in?
POST: Oh, I’m sure they were. I’m not sure that we’ve ever really fully
explored it. I went to all the demonstrations, and usually the children, a
40:00portion of the children who were able went with me. My son David went to thefirst Vietnam moratorium that left here in ‘68, or was it ‘69? It must have
been ‘68 because he was thirteen. Two buses left from the seminary to go up
to Washington. I went over to take some cookies to my friends who were riding
the buses, and they had an extra seat, and he went with them. They had to have
been certainly aware of it without maybe fully understanding what the issues
were. I’m sure they didn’t--I’m sure that they, as the rest of the
Louisville community who knew Ed and me, believed that Ed was really supportive
of me and he really wasn’t. He kept trying to hold me back. And I guess I
felt that you probably can’t expect a mate to agree with everything you do,
but I do think you have a right to expect a mate not to oppose you on things
that you consider -- so I just, you know,
41:00I just sort of left that marriagepretty much emotionally, just left. It was just …
BRINSON: How about your parents and your brothers? How did they feel about
your involvement?
POST: I didn’t ask them and I’m--my father was on my side. My mother sure
didn’t--she did what--she didn’t allow herself to think a lot. My father
believed the world was obscene, and the race issue was just horrible. He was by
that time supporting a lot of things financially that tried to--my father gave
me--up until the time he died--an annual subscription to The Nation magazine, to
the Daily New York Times, to, oh, another one. Not the New Reader but another
one. When my father died, I said, “Boy, I’ve lost my father and a
subscription to three, you know, periodicals. This is terrible.” He was very
supportive. I think as he got older he got more into,
42:00made some connections andhe got to be very outspoken, wrote letters. And so did my brother, so did my
brother. My sister, the twins were a sister and a brother, my sister was just
never involved. So, I don’t know. I, uh, you know there are times when I get
really, uh, regret--I really regret that I didn’t have a partner who could
have supported me. But, you know, that happens. I’m sure that’s the
history of women.
BRINSON: So in 1968 you ran for the state legislature?
POST: ‘75.
BRINSON: Oh, ‘75. That was later. Okay. Well, two things --
POST: When David Karem--you know who David Karem is?
BRINSON: Uh --
POST: He’s a state senator, the house majority speaker, whatever they call
it. Speaker of the House--no, I don’t know what his title is, but he’s a
big muckety-muck in Frankfort. David Karem. From Louisville.
BRINSON: Okay and what about him?
POST: He decided in ‘75 to
43:00not run for the General Assembly, for the House,and run for the Senate. When he decided to leave that, I decided to run for his
seat, because I had really had it up to my kazoo in helping people get elected
to office, and then you go to them with your issue and they say, “Oh yeah, I
agree with you Suzy, but --but -- but-- .”
BRINSON: And what were your campaign issues?
POST: My campaign issues [laughing] were, were probably what got me defeated:
pro-choice, anti-death penalty, uh, pro-civil rights. And I had a huge number
of people working for me. I mean, I had all the Gene McCarthy people left over
from ‘68. I got elected the State Council Committee of the Democratic Party
in that campaign. So I had all the people who worked in the McCarthy campaign,
I had all the women who, you know believed that choice was crucial. And I had
the white civil rights people in that district. It was a fabulous group.
44:00I hadmore damn fun. I really did have fun, and it was a very close race. It really
was. And the woman who beat me was a good, a good person. She had been on the
board of aldermen two terms and decided to run when she got in some political
trouble down there, even though I had told her I’d help her raise money if she
ran for mayor. And I would have gone crazy up there, Betsy. I mean, I like the
big--I don’t want to deal with land use stuff and regulations.
BRINSON: So after that campaign did you think about running again?
POST: Never. Never. Never.
BRINSON: Okay. So what was happening -- two things really. I’m going to go
way back to the early sixties, uh, Governor Bert Combs and then Ned Breathitt
that you talked about. Combs actually was responsible--at least some things
happened under his term, like the establishment of the Commission on Human
Relations--and then Breathitt
45:00takes credit for some civil rights activity atsome point. But do you have any recollection or perspective on that --?
POST: No, I don’t think they did anything other than what they were forced to
do. I don’t think either of those men had any vision whatsoever. Bert was a
really smart guy who was a much better federal judge than he was governor of
Kentucky. I think he was an honest governor, but I don’t think those were,
those were issues that they were forced--I mean, they were foisted upon them.
The Kentucky Commission on Human Rights, like most of those agencies, was
created to work some, to take off a lot of heat and work minimum change, you
know. The present director, who you and I both know, is a close friend of mine.
I just agonize with her over some of the stuff they have to deal with. It’s
just, you, know, but that’s the way--that’s what they were created to be.
They weren’t created to do anything really major.
BRINSON: Didn’t you serve on a -- yes, you did.
POST: On the local one.
BRINSON: Right, from ‘75 to ‘82 as the
46:00women’s --POST: As a staff person and then from ‘82 till about ‘90-something I was a
commissioner there. It was very demoralizing. I’m lobbying right now to try,
as a member of this transition team, to get that agency’s charter changed
because it’s dysfunctional as hell. They have twenty-one members so they can
never get a quorum. I mean, this goes back forever. The mayor and county judge
stick people on there who haven’t a clue what civil --
END OF TAPE 1, SIDE A
START OF TAPE 1, SIDE B
BRINSON: Go back to the McCarthy campaign, I wonder if you recall any African
Americans working in that campaign?
POST: Not a one.
BRINSON: Okay. Okay. Um, Louisville, I believe--of course, the Brown decision
in ‘54--but Louisville didn’t actually begin to desegregate schools until ‘56.
POST: And then it was, it was flawed, because Homer Carmichael,
47:00the LouisvilleSchool Superintendent, said that anybody could go to any school that they wanted
to go to. What he didn’t say was ‘as long as there’s a space.’ So,
black kids who might want to go to a white school had no chance of getting in
there unless--you know, you might have a smattering of one here, two there but
it was really, it was, let’s just take the restrictions down and see what
happens. Given the housing patterns and--I mean, nothing much occurred. And he
got this big deal from President Eisenhower at that time because we were
supposed to have done such a good job of peaceful desegregation and nothing
really changed.
BRINSON: And then I think in ‘72 you were a plaintiff in a lawsuit, school
desegregation again.
POST: Right. Right.
BRINSON: Talk about that a little bit.
POST: Well, in 1969 I became the president of what was then KCLU.
48:00And innineteen --
BRINSON: Kentucky Civil Liberties Union?
POST: Right. And in 1970, in 1970 we were approached by some black people,
most notably I guess, Lyman Johnson, who had desegregated the University of
Kentucky graduate school. We were approached by Lyman and some other people
about suing the Board of Education of Louisville. So we studied it, and we
debated it, and we had endless meetings as to whether or not we wanted to
undertake that. It was a big, ambitious proposal. We even had hearings in the
black community to find out what black people wanted. And it went on and on.
Finally, in 1972 Bob Settler, who was our general counsel, volunteer general
counsel and a tenured law professor at U of K, filed suit. And in the
49:00course ofputting that suit together--he needed--he thought he would like to have a white
plaintiff who had children, white children in the public schools, so I said, “Sure.”
BRINSON: How old were your children at that time?
POST In 1972--David was born in ‘55. He’s my oldest one and the youngest
one was ten years younger. So …
BRINSON: So he would have been in high school.
POST: Yeah. So they were all in public schools, so it gave me some legitimacy
to go out there and try and promote peaceful school desegregation. And I got
real immersed in it. I mean, the thing dragged on from ‘72 to ‘75 when it
was really, finally implemented. And there was enormous opposition in the
county, just enormous opposition. I mean, it was an organizing vehicle for the
Klan and for every little Save Our Community school group that you could--the
county was just ringed with opponents and
50:00organizing against schooldesegregation, because it meant busing their kids. And, ah, it was very
tempestuous. It was the most tempestuous period I’ve lived through in this town.
BRINSON: I want to talk about this a little bit in greater detail here if we
can. You filed in federal court?
POST: Right.
BRINSON: Do you remember who the judge was or what you --?
POST: That was Gordon.
BRINSON: Talk about him.
POST: Well, he was Republican. He was very conservative. The most interesting
thing about--he got, he got overruled twice by the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals and finally on third, third time he just said, “Desegregate.” And
he said, “You’ve got to have a plan in six weeks and that’s it.” So the
Board of Education of Louisville had a demographer who whips out this plan,
literally, in six weeks that the city was stuck with. It’s a pretty good
plan, amazingly. His--Judge
51:00Gordon went through a major transformation havingbeen overturned twice on this thing. He began to come around and he began to,
he and Bob Settler began to develop a very collegial relationship. Tim Hogan,
Tom Hogan, who took over the case when Bob Settler left Louisville, and he had a
very, you know, a very close relationship. Tom was --
BRINSON: Who was Tom?
POST: Tom Hogan, who was the young attorney, who is a very dear, dear friend of
mine, who had worked in Frankfort in the General Assembly as an aide, who was a
feisty little Irishman, who was just--I just adored him. He was about fifteen
years younger than me, too. He signed--he was an ACLU member and been a
president, but he was hired by Galen Martin at the Kentucky Commission on Human
Rights to take a suit that
52:00was broader than the ACLU suit originally. The ACLUsuit was a lawsuit challenging the legal Board of Education. Galen wanted a
merger suit. We didn’t file a merger suit after these hearings in the black
community, because the black community didn’t want it for the same reasons
they don’t want merger of city/county government today: they’re afraid
they’d lose their power base. At the time the original suit was filed, there
were five Louisville school board members, three of whom were black. They knew
that if they merged with the county, they were going to lose that.
BRINSON: And this would just be a merger of the school system, not all --?
POST: Right. Right. So, so Galen got Tom Hogan, who had once worked for the
Kentucky Commission on Human Rights, to file a suit that was a separate suit,
merging. The judge ordered--eventually ordered that the two suits--the ACLU
suit and the Kentucky Commission suit, be merged. Tom Hogan, who is younger and
less experienced than Bob Settler, worked alongside Bob. They worked
beautifully
53:00together. Bob eventually left and went to Cornell. When he left,he turned everything over to Hogan to carry out the terms of the lawsuit. Uh,
where was I going with this?
BRINSON: Who was the other plaintiff?
POST: Oh, there were a lot of them. There was a guy named Earl Alliuisi who
was a vice president at the University of Louisville; there was a woman named
Penny Lane who had been a CETA worker in our office; uh, gosh who else was
there? I can’t remember. There were about six or seven of them. I mean,
they just tried to cover all their bases in terms of having standing.
BRINSON: Right. Was there a lot of news publicity about filing the suit?
POST: Oh, oh, it was front-page headlines. Yes. From that time on--from the
day that lawsuit was filed until just about -- till I left the ACLU in 1982. So
from 1970 when we started talking about it, till
54:001972 when it was filed, till1982 when I left the ACLU--took this other job--was I able to divorce myself
from that lawsuit. I felt very responsible for all the negative things that
were happening as a consequence of that. I worked in one coalition after
another to try and force some changes in procedures that the, that the board of
education--that resulted in the disproportionate suspensions of black kids and
the tracking of them, you know, channeling of them into EMH classes and BD
classes. It was just --
BRINSON: BD? What’s BD?
POST: Behavioral disorder. It’s behavioral, I think that’s what it is --
behavioral disability. I may have lost an acronym in there. But for all those
years, I really felt so personally responsible that I couldn’t back off. It
was just so--and now I’m just like--it’s not anywhere on my--I just can’t
deal with that. I’m burnt out. So I spent--at the same time
55:00I was monitoringcompliance with the court order as a member of the human relations commission
staff, I was doing Title IX monitoring at the human relations commission on the
board of education. So I was at the board of education every damn meeting they
had. I spent wedding anniversaries, birthdays out there constantly. They were
horrible meetings. They were horrible meetings. Just so much bureaucracy. I
mean, I just, and I was trying to organize--it was just like this massive
expenditure of energy to try and remedy what, you know, the lawsuit had not
changed. And to this day, those problems prevail. The problem of, you know,
too many suspensions of black kids, disproportionate suspensions, not enough
kids in, not enough black kids in advance programs, too many black kids in
educable, mentally handicapped classes, when teachers just can’t figure out
how to relate to them. I mean, just--not enough black administrators, not
enough black teachers,
56:00although that figure has come up a little bit. But itwas really probably one of the most expensive things I’ve ever done in my life.
BRINSON: I want to talk a little bit about that. And this was before--you were
involved with the ACLU, but you had not yet become the Director of the ACLU?
POST: No, I was President of the Board.
BRINSON: Of the Board, okay.
POST: And there were very few--I should tell you--at the time I became
president in ‘69, I think there was maybe one other president, woman
president, of an ACLU affiliate. Then in ‘70 I got myself elected to the
national board, which is when you met me. That was my, that was my mission.
That was my agenda when I went up there. I purposely got myself elected.
BRINSON: What was your agenda?
POST: Women’s issues. Trying to get more women into leadership positions,
and trying to get the organization to be responsive to women’s
57:00program needs.BRINSON: All right. All right, go back to the lawsuit. How did the community
relate to you as an individual in doing that?
POST: Badly. Well, it depends on which community you’re talking about. The
Jewish community couldn’t stand me. I’ll give you a newspaper article.
Have you looked in the Courier Journal for-- . I had some stuff poly--what do
they call it when you take stuff to Kinko’s and they put that plastic over it?
BRINSON: Laminated.
POST: Thank you. I never remember that word. I was going through some stuff
the other day, and I had some things laminated for the children--had copies made
for the children--of newspaper articles and stuff that appeared. I’ll give
you--don’t let me not give you one which you can give me back--because I only
had five copies made; that the Courier Journal did about a year ago last July
which tells the story--my daughter was coming, when she was eight, was walking
home from school--when
58:00she was eight, that would have been ‘73.BRINSON: So the case was about a year --?
POST: No, it wasn’t ‘73. It was--wait a minute--’65, ‘72. She must
have been older, because she was walking home alone with this kid from
school--she must have been ten or eleven--and they came, and the school is in an
easy walking distance of my house, and they came to the end of the street--we
lived off a dead end street--and Rachel turned off to go down that street. This
little girl who was walking with her said, “Oh, that’s where that awful Suzy
Post lives.” Rachel said, “That’s my mom.” And my son Stephen tells
the story, and you’ll see it in this newspaper clipping I’m going to give
you; he wrote a column about me. He writes for a Madison newspaper from time to
time. He wrote a column about me for Mother’s Day, didn’t tell me about it.
He told the story of how when he was in junior high school, or high school, he
and
59:00another friend went to a women’s club to give some kind of presentation--Iprobably haven’t got any of these facts right. Anyway, after they gave their
presentation, one of the women said to the other student who was with him, whose
last name was also Post--she was the daughter of a doctor who lived a couple of
blocks away. The woman said to Martha, “Oh, are you that terrible, that awful
Suzy Post’s daughter?” And Stephen said, “No, that’s me. No, that’s
my mother.” “Is that awful Suzy Post your mother?” and Stephen said,
“No, she’s my mother.” So, I’ve often said to other friends of mine
that, you know, it doesn’t make me feel good to know that I did what I did
without really considering what the consequences might be to my children,
because I was so convinced of the moral rightness of what I was doing, and had
such an urgent
60:00need to do it. You could rationalize now and say, “Well, I wastrying to make the world a better place for them, too.” But, no, I was just
trying to do the right thing, and I never even thought about what that might do
in terms of my children.
BRINSON: Did they come home and tell you these stories? Were they --?
POST: No, they didn’t. They really didn’t. And I said something to
Stephen, who is now a college professor, not too long ago. I said, “God.”
I said, “Didn’t you--wasn’t it awful? I mean I was out there all the
time. I was in the newspaper all the time.” He said, “No, I thought it was
pretty cool. The other kids’ mothers made cookies.” He said, “I thought
it was pretty cool.” I don’t know if he really thought it was cool at the
time. Maybe he did. But …
BRINSON: And how about Ed?
POST: Ed was really afraid that it was going to reflect badly on him and his
law practice. In fairness to Ed, it could be that his, his not wanting to get
out there
61:00was concern that it, he might not be able to provide for his family.It might have deleterious effect on his income producing. I don’t know; we
never talked about it. I didn’t ask him either. I mean, I’d gotten to the
point where I didn’t ask. I just did. When I went up to--I guess one of the
most painful memories I have is when I went to New York the first time in 1969
for a development conference up at Lake Mohawk --
BRINSON: The ACLU?
POST: Yeah, the first time. In 1969 I was thirty-six years old. Thirty-six
years old. He didn’t want me to go. He did not want me to go. He said,
“You’re not going to go.” And you know what I did? I cried. I mean, can
you believe it? I look back and think, I cried? Why didn’t I say, “Screw
you. I’m going to go.” I didn’t. I cried and cried. I went. I was
determined to go and I went. I got elected. I was the first woman on what they
used to call the steering committee. It was a really boring group of three,
62:00three E. D’s, three elected at-large and--there were nine of us. I can’tremember who the other three were.
BRINSON: So this is a steering committee of, for development --?
POST: That allocated money. That used to make grants. Before the sharing --
BRINSON: I don’t remember --
POST: No, you wouldn’t. It’s the dark ages. But they’d sit
around--they’d take grants from--applications from affiliates and decide which
affiliate was going to get some money. It was a pretty powerful position, and
they’d never had a woman. I’m like one woman and eight men. And I’ll
tell you who helped me get elected, in fact, asked me to run, was Jay Miller
from Illinois. So the day I got elected--that night--well, the day I got
elected I called home to tell Edward, and I said, “Guess what?” And I knew
he wasn’t happy about my being up here all by myself. I think it was sexual
jealousy really. I said, “I got elected to the steering committee.” And
there was this deep silence, and he said, “Does that mean you’re going to
go,
63:00you’ve got to go away again?” I said, “Well, three times a year.”And he--you could, you know, the silence was deafening. And I was so hurt. I
mean, you know, I was so excited; I was really proud of myself. So, like I
said, my marriage started to unfold, dissolve in ‘68, and this didn’t help
that he was just--but, I never, we never discussed anything. I just did
whatever I wanted to do and whether or not that’s a great way to run a
marriage or a family, I don’t know, but --
BRINSON: Did you meet anybody out of the whole school deseg litigation that you
became good friends with, who supported you?
POST: No, I can’t, I can’t remember that I did. Ann and I had had a
relationship prior to that time, Ann Braden. A woman that I--no, I didn’t
even meet her at that time. The current school board member. She didn’t
64:00really--no, I don’t think. I don’t think so. I don’t--I just didn’thave much--Bob Settler, the lawyer, was very supportive and Tim, Tom Hogan, the
other lawyer, was very supportive. But, no, I would go into things in the
Jewish community, and it was [laughing] like smallpox had been introduced into
the room. One time I had Dr. Spock down here, in ‘70, I think. This is prior
to school deseg, and I brought him here to talk about anti-war stuff. We had
this huge meeting, and there were seven hundred people there at that time,
because he was real involved in draft counseling, and we were doing a lot of it.
And when he got up to speak he mentioned Fred Hampton and the Black Panther
murders in Chicago. I thought, “Wow.” I go to a party somewhere like a
week later and this woman who’s the wife of my
65:00pediatrician says, “Whatabout the Black Panthers?” I mean, real hostile. So, I was, I was --
BRINSON: She was associating them with you as a result of -- brought Dr. Spock in?
POST: Yeah. So, I was too far ahead of the community really. Ironically, that
community just voted, just gave me this last May its most prestigious award,
which is very funny. But, you know, things change. The Jewish community.
It’s just sort of so--I think I was ahead of my time as far as the Jewish
community was concerned. Now they’re where they should be, but not right.
So, no, I don’t think I had--it was pretty lonely, I’ve got to say. It was
kind of, you know, I had a relationship with the ACLU board --
BRINSON: Right.
POST: --but they weren’t really intimate friends.
BRINSON: And where was the NAACP with --?
POST: It had a cooperating
66:00attorney who was there titularly, if there is such aword, but who didn’t do anything. He
is now a county commissioner; his name is Daryl Owens.
BRINSON: And they filed --?
POST: They were part of it. They were attorneys of record, too, but they
didn’t do anything. They were just there for window dressing.
BRINSON: Okay. Did you ever have any interaction with Georgia Power?
POST: Not really although Tom Hogan had worked with her a lot in the
legislature. She was not involved in that school deseg suit.
BRINSON: Okay. How about a woman named Lukie Ward?
POST: No, she wasn’t either. My first involvement with Lukie was when I ran
for the General Assembly in ‘75. She sort of insinuated herself into my good
offices, and I use this language quite deliberately, because she had had--she
had an ax to grind with my opponent. And she wanted to get the other woman, and
the way she was going to get her was to have me beat her. I mean, it took
67:00me along time to realize that, but, but, no, I didn’t--one of the people who
wasn’t--when she was marching much earlier, and she was about the only white
woman around, I was somewhere else. I’m sure that what she did was admirable.
I’ve never had any really great experiences with her, but I’m sure that,
you know, she did some really great things because people say so.
BRINSON: It sounds like she knew the Democratic Party structure and worked in
campaigns much earlier.
POST: She’s from the East.
BRINSON: She worked on Georgia’s campaign.
POST: Yeah, they were really good friends.
BRINSON: And she’s dead now, right?
POST: Yeah, she died about three years ago, not quite. Her son was elected to
Congress and then when she died, he blew the next election, and we’ve got a
conservative Republican over here named Ann Northup.
BRINSON: How about Eleanor Love, Whitney Young’s sister?
POST: I never knew her. I never knew her. Oh, I do! Dr. Love.
BRINSON: Right, she’s still living.
POST: Yeah, she was the commission president when I was on the commission. I
68:00never really saw her in an activist position, and, in fact, Eleanor Love waspresident of the commission when uh -- uh, the nomination of--Oh, God, having
brain trouble today--the black supreme court justice-- .
BRINSON: Thurgood Marshall?
POST: No, the --
BRINSON: Clarence Thomas?
POST: When Clarence Thomas was nominated, the commission was going to pass a
resolution endorsing his nomination, and I spoke passionately against it. But
Eleanor Love was the chair of the commission and she supported it. They came
within a hair’s breath of doing that.
BRINSON: What happened that they didn’t?
POST: Well, I stopped them, basically. I was so vociferous, and none of them
had enough of a feel for him.
BRINSON: Okay. At that point, you were a commission member?
POST: I was a commissioner.
BRINSON: Okay. Good for you.
POST: Yeah, well, good for me.
BRINSON: Right. I’m actually listening to Anita Hill’s book about the
69:00whole experience on tape now as I’m driving around the state.POST: Oh, God, it just killed me to have to go to work in those days, that I
couldn’t hear those things. Just killed me.
BRINSON: Right. Right. I want to talk a little bit--how are we doing? [Interruption]
POST: That will give me a little time to take a shower and get dressed.
BRINSON: I want to talk about the whole housing movement because my
recollection is that that was early on a big piece of the program, the civil
rights program in this community, was an issue.
POST: Oh, yeah, it was--the open housing movement. I’m not exactly sure--and
Ann is a much better resource on this than me--as you know, I don’t keep
notes; I don’t keep a journal. I’m so sorry now. I keep dumping on myself
for having not done those things. I mean, I do it with great regularity. Oh,
why didn’t you keep a record of that? That was a really interesting time. My
involvement in the open housing movement was to, you know, support it, to help --
BRINSON: And goes back to when?
POST: I’m
70:00not even sure, Betsy, what year that was. I really don’t know.The Council of--National Council of Jewish Women had a group, study group that
surfaced the issue. They had a little pin that people wore. It was black with
a white equal sign on it. At my other house I had this sticker on my front
window forever that said, ‘Open housing is morally right.’ One of these
really grab you sayings. [laughter-Brinson] I don’t know when in the sixties
that was. I’m just not good at the dates. But that campaign--I’m not even
sure where the impetus started for that, whether it was the black community or
the white community. I’m just not sure. But that heated up big, and it was a
question of--some interesting things happened as a consequence of it. First, we
had these demonstrations all around town, uh, supporting open housing and being,
you know, people being attacked by the opposition. The demonstrations, I think,
were
71:00to propose, to pass an anti-discrimination ordinance by the Board ofAlderman. It took a while. One of the interesting byproducts of that whole
thing was that the Human Relations Commission’s first director was a Quaker
named Mansard Tidings. And he supported passage of an open housing ordinance,
and came out publicly so stating, and his commissioners fired him. When they
fired him, the National Association of Human Rights organization, which is an
affiliation of all these state and local agencies nationally, blackballed the
Human Relations Commission and got the word out nobody should apply for the
vacant job now. And the place was absolutely leaderless for, I think, a couple
of years. In the interim, my rabbi, who married me, had gotten deeply
72:00 involvedin Negotiation Now, which was an anti-war group that wanted to negotiate a peace
settlement, he and another minister. His congregation became very impatient
with him, and angry with him, because he was spending a lot of time and energy
doing anti-war stuff, and they thought he wasn’t making enough hospital visits
and tending, you know, da, da, da, da, da. So when he went to them for a raise
when his contract was up in 19- whatever year it was, ‘69 or ‘70, they
didn’t--they said no they weren’t going to do it and he resigned from my
synagogue as rabbi. His wife, who is a real ( ) and a real intellectual,
talked him into going and applying for the job that Mansard had been fired from.
He was out of work for a while, and then he went and applied and they hired
him. They were delighted to have somebody fill that position.
BRINSON: And this was all before Galen Martin?
POST: No, this was the local agency. Galen was the state.
BRINSON: Oh, I got you. Okay. Right.
POST: He
73:00hired me in 1975 when I’m, you know, trying to figure out what kindof marketable skills have I got. I mean, I didn’t have many really, or at
least I didn’t know how to sell them. So he had gotten some money from the
democratic mayor to do some women’s programming. We had been pushing Harvey
Sloane, the mayor, to put some resources into programming for women. So good
old Harvey gives Martin Purley, the director, eight thou, $8,000 to hire a staff
to do it. So Martin hired me. And I started work--this was chilling--I started
work at the Human Relations Commission in August of 19-, maybe it was even
September, -75 on the day that school started. The day that school started.
The year we desegregated. And my office building was directly across the street
from the city police department, and when I turned down around the corner to go
into this building, and looked across the street at the
74:00city police department,and their parking lot is wall-to-wall police in black riot gear with the helmets
and things down and black everywhere and rifles. It was chilling; it was just
scary as hell. I mean, to see these people all prepared for God knows what.
BRINSON: They thought that there was going to be a lot of violence.
POST: Everybody did. Everybody thought so. So that was the day I began work,
and I was the only one in that whole agency who knew anything about the schools
or school desegregation or integration or any of it. So there was this huge
vacuum which I then proceeded to fill, and the same was true of the women’s
stuff. And for a long time, I was really the presence of that agency. The
directors were kind of just--although Martin I got to say was very good about
getting out publicly and taking the moral high road. Nobody else has done that
since in all the years that he’s been gone. It’s a real loss to the
community that they don’t have somebody, a vocal spokesperson.
BRINSON: When the schools desegregated, were your children concerned
75:00 aboutpotential violence?
POST: I don’t think so. I don’t think so. I mean we never talked about--I
mean, we just, we didn’t do that at home. Only one of my children, the year
we desegregated, was being bused out of the neighborhood to a school in the
downtown area. It was a really good experience for him. It was interesting,
you know? He was in middle school--I guess he was in seventh grade by then--and
he could handle that kind of stuff. Rachel, I guess, was -- Rachel was ten that
year and he was thirteen. So, I mean, you know, they were not little, wee
things. And I don’t think the question of violence came up in terms of the
East End. That’s not where the violence was being focused. It was out in the
county, in the schools that were ringing the county. The East End was too well
behaved, too polite to support that.
BRINSON: Well, were they busing black children into the counties? That
was--was that the
76:00basis for the concern?POST: The basis of the concern was that some county students were even bused
into the inner city. And they didn’t want their kids to leave the
neighborhoods and go into that terrible inner city. Then I heard--amazingly
enough, people actually admit to these things, that they didn’t think it was a
good idea to bring black children into their, ( ) white neighborhoods because
then the black--this is really sad--then the black kids would see what white
kids have and they’d want it, too. Don’t you wonder about people’s
willingness to say such terribly crass things?
BRINSON: Uh, hmm.
POST: So, there was that kind of resistance and there were, of course, the
normal real apprehension about change, which wouldn’t have made any difference
much what it was. But then it was confused and, uh, exacerbated by adding race
to the whole thing when people were so--they weren’t even ambivalent about
race. I mean, in 1975 when that thing happened blacks were clearly inferior and
that’s all there was to it. They
77:00were criminal element and they were violentand they were going to rape their daughters.
BRINSON: Was Lyman Johnson active with you --?
POST: Lyman, yes. Lyman got himself elected to the board of education after
that and he was, he and a friend of mine named Carolyn Hudow--and she would be
very good to talk to, although she was never active in the civil rights
movement. She just had good instincts and got herself elected--well, actually,
she was appointed to the board by the previous Louisville superintendent.
Carolyn Hudow. Mrs. Jim on Hill Road. Lyman was elected--he was president of
the NAACP. I was on his board at the time he got elected. He and Carolyn for a
long time were the only voices there, you know, in terms of advocating for black
students. Lyman was very active. Very active. He was very important.
BRINSON: And what was the NAACP doing at this point? They were part of the
lawsuit, but they didn’t really do a lot. Were they doing educational forums?
POST: They were making -- Yeah, they
78:00had a--well, no, they had an educationcommittee chair, cause I was on his committee. They weren’t doing much. They
have never--they haven’t been really viable here in my lifetime. I mean, in
my public lifetime.
BRINSON: Right. Was --?
POST: And now you can’t even find them. I mean, I’ve been trying to get
them involved, and there is no ‘them’ right now. They’re just totally gone.
BRINSON: Right. Was there ever --?
POST: There is an SCLC.
BRINSON: Okay. Let me finish. The NAACP, was there ever any educational
literature that was designed, distributed, door-to-door canvases --?
POST: Not that I’m aware of. There may have been. I’m not aware of it.
BRINSON: Okay. Go ahead and talk about SCLC.
POST: Well, SCLC was probably at the time, because of Dr. King, more viable
than the NAACP, but it’s gone, it’s sort of dissolved, too. Had a preacher
named Reverend, uh -- oh, what was his name?
BRINSON: Not
79:00A.D. Willliams? That was Martin’s brother.POST: That was his brother; he drowned. No, it’ll come to me. There
really--I don’t know why there weren’t any vital black groups. There just
weren’t. Now the black community is pretty well organized around economic
issues and economic development issues and those kinds of things. It’s just
not real, still not pressing much on the civil rights stuff. I guess most of
the battles have been won to some degree.
BRINSON: Okay. So, in 1990 you became the executive director of the
Metropolitan Housing Coalition. Is that--tell me about the history of the
Coalition, and is, are they there, in part, because of some of the earlier
interest in housing issues?
POST: Uh-uh
BRINSON: No? Okay.
POST: No, they’re an outgrowth of the Reagan budget
80:00cuts and real concern bysocial service people and city and county housing officials in around 1989 that
those budget cuts were going to produce horrendous effects on poor people in the
community, and we better start strategizing about how we’re going to try to
staunch that wound. And so, about ten or fifteen of them started meeting and
they drafted some bylaws and they got incorporated and limped along--well, they
did probably better than that--and in about a year hit up the Bingham fund for
money to professionalize. And so, so they got that money right before I walked
off the ACLU job. And a friend of mine, who had been in on the ground floor of
that, came and talked to me. She said, “You know, that’d be a great job for
you.” I didn’t know a damn thing about housing, nothing. But, I also
didn’t know what I
81:00was going to do for myself in the future. I had no--I wasnot independently wealthy. And …
BRINSON: Had you divorced by that time?
POST: Oh, yeah, he had died.
BRINSON: Oh, okay.
POST: He had died. He died in 1986. And we--he died about twelve days after
the divorce was final.
BRINSON: Okay.
POST: So I was living, had been living here alone for four years. And, uh, so
I decided, Okay, I’ll apply for the job. So I sent my resume off, and I got a
call to come for an interview. But they wanted to hire somebody on a contract
basis, so I proceeded to go in there--and they’re nice people, some of them I
had known--and I proceeded to tell them why that won’t work. And you know, it
was great that they got this funding, but I’m not the right person for the job
and da, da, da, da, da, da, da. And then, I’m sure you’ll find somebody who
will do it on contract and I left. And the president called me up later in the
afternoon. He said, “What would it take to get you?” I said,
“Twenty-five thousand dollars, health insurance, pay my
82:00taxes and a commitmentthat some of the executive committee members will meet with me once a week, and
I don’t mean for six weeks, but ad infinitum because I don’t know a damn
thing.” And he said, “Okay, it’s done.” So, I tease him all the
time--it’s probably one of the smartest things he’s ever done in his life
[laughter-Brinson]--and I think he thinks so, too. And it’s just been great.
I’ve loved it. My executive committee met with me every single Wednesday
morning for two years at breakfast, 7:30 downtown. And it was only ended after
two years because I had a new president who didn’t want to get up that early.
She just ( ) called it off. I was so angry with her. I’m still angry about
it because it was great. They got a lot of information. They just showed up.
Not the same ones every single week but, you know, a critical mass. Three or
four people, sometimes eight or nine. And it--to me--you know--was just great.
I thought, well, the honeymoon period has got to end sometime. It never did. I
mean, Dolores interrupted it and I had a couple of bad years with her. When
83:00 Itook the job as director of MHC, the board had twenty-one members, two black
people, very low profile on the equity stuff. It took me about six years to
reshape the board but I did. Now 25 percent of my board is African American.
It is geographically, age, economically and occupationally diverse. I also
created a fair housing coalition within my Coalition, and pulled together for
monthly meetings those organizations and agencies that have a vested interest in
ending discrimination in housing. And that’s been the Urban League and the
Kentucky Commission on Human Rights, the Human Relations Commission and NOW and
the Fairness Campaign which is trying to get civil rights protection for gays
and lesbians. It’s about fifteen different groups. And, I sort of pumped up
the fair housing/anti-discrimination part of MHC’s mission to be
84:00really outthere. And we’ve become the primary advocate, not either of the commissions,
but MHC has become the primary advocate for ending racial segregation in housing
and racial economics in Jefferson County. So, it’s been a really good vehicle
for that. I’m convinced that I’m on the mayor’s transition team--well, he
likes me and I like him--but I pulled together two really effective candidates
for him. One in April on fair housing; April is Fair Housing Month, da, da, da,
da, da, da. And one in October on the portable housing issues, and we had--they
both were at the Urban League at 5:30 in the evening, and each of them had a
hundred people. Intermedia, which is our cable company, televised the last one
and it’s been on and on and on and on. So, I’ve been able to pump up their
persona, you know, in the community, and I’ve been able to pump up the civil
rights piece of it. And it’s good, because I’m
85:00old enough now--I know Ihave to bring my board along. So I’ve been just sort of feeding them.
BRINSON: Do you have to raise money, too?
POST: Oh, yeah. I have to do everything. I have to raise the budget; I have
to dream up the meetings; I have to find new board members. I can’t think of
a function I don’t do.
BRINSON: Is the Bingham fund still supporting --?
POST: No, because it folded when she died. That was the end of the fund
when--Mary Bingham died three or four years ago. But I did cultivate a
relationship with the director of the foundation, and got him to give me $25,000
more. I asked for $50,000 and he was being chintzy, but he gave me $25,000 more
so it was $125,000 really.
BRINSON: So where do you raise your money?
POST: My money comes from membership fees from my members.
BRINSON: Which are organizations?
POST: Let me see what I’ve got here. Yeah.
BRINSON: Don’t walk too far away.
POST: You should read this because this is sort of our present platform.
BRINSON: That would be good.
POST Oh,
86:00let’s see if I have it. Oh, here it is.BRINSON: You have how many organizations?
POST: Hundred and two.
BRINSON: That are members --
POST: Members. They pay dues. The city and the county give me a very, very
little bit. Here it is.
BRINSON: What are the leading civil rights groups in Louisville?
POST: In Louisville?
BRINSON: Today.
POST: Probably the Kentucky Alliance Against Racist and Political Oppression,
which is bringing Angela Davis here this weekend, and the ACLU. That’s
probably--those are--that’s probably it.
BRINSON: Okay. I’m going to stop and suggest we come back another time --
POST: Okay.
BRINSON: -- and talk about Kentucky Civil Liberties Union and some of the
women’s issues a little bit more, but
87:00I just wonder, based on what all wetalked about today, is there anything you think you’d do differently --?
POST: That I would do differently?
BRINSON: Yeah.
POST: Oh, my God, everything. I would do everything differently. [laughing]
Sure. I never understood people who say, “I wouldn’t change a thing.” I
think--I would not have five children. I would not marry so young. I would
prepare myself for some kind of a real, real job. I wouldn’t waste so much
time and energy--well, no that’s not true. I mean, I guess those are all
personal things. Occupationally, I don’t think I would do anything
differently. I mean, I’m proud of the work I did in each of the three jobs
88:00I’ve had. I’ve been--it’s amazing to me with as little training as I’vehad, formal training as I’ve had, that I’ve been as effective as I have
been. And huh, I love to work with people, and each of these jobs has allowed
me to work with them, you know. And I’ve been very fortunate in people I’ve
been able to work with. I get a lot of my power and strength from having a base
behind me, so I don’t have any real regrets professionally. I have a lot--any
woman who juggles all this stuff, I mean, something’s got to give, and so I
have some regrets about those issues.
BRINSON: Okay, let’s stop.
END OF INTERVIEW
89:00